"We sign hundreds of agreements every year that don't require CEO approval, and this was no different," he said, adding that the agreement "was never a secret." Google's Schottenfels said the lawsuit's allegation that Pichai approved the deal with Facebook "isn't accurate."
Meta original redacted email code#
Internally, Google used the code phrase "Jedi Blue" to refer to the 2018 agreement, according to the lawsuit. "These business relationships enable Meta to deliver more value to advertisers while fairly compensating publishers, resulting in better outcomes for all," Sgro said. Meta spokesperson Chris Sgro said Friday that the company's ad bidding agreement with Google and similar agreements it has with other bidding platforms "have helped to increase competition for ad placements." Sandberg, who was once the head of Google's ad business, and Pichai personally signed off on the deal, per the states' complaint.
In September 2018, the complaint says, the two companies signed the agreement. from the original document and save the redacted version with a new name. In a statement, Google spokesperson Peter Schottenfels said the lawsuit is "full of inaccuracies and lacks legal merit." Some redaction techniques used when e-filing are ineffective, in that the text. Zuckerberg wanted to meet with Sandberg and his other executives before making a decision, the complaint states. "We're nearly ready to sign and need your approval to move forward," the email read, according to the complaint. When the two sides hammered out the terms of the agreement, "the team sent an email addressed directly to CEO" Zuckerberg, the lawsuit states. While the names of the Facebook executives are still redacted in the suit, their titles are visible. Facebook has since renamed itself Meta.Īccording to the lawsuit, Facebook's chief operating officer, Sheryl Sandberg, was "explicit that 'this is a big deal strategically'" in a 2018 email thread about the deal that included Facebook's CEO. But the unredacted version offers details on the involvement of Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai and Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg in approving the deal. The original, redacted lawsuit, filed in December 2021, accused Google of "anti-competitive conduct" and of teaming up with the social networking giant. The CEOs of both companies were aware of the deal and signed off on it, the lawsuit alleges. No rejection e-mail received either.Newly unredacted documents from a state-led antitrust lawsuit against Google accuse the search giant of colluding with rival Facebook to manipulate online advertising sales. Please ignore.” nothing happens, nothing shows up in log either. Replying by e-mail to post by other user with text “This is a longer test reply by e-mail. Please visit the topic to continue the conversation.īut the message was just 5 minutes or so old. We only accept replies to original notifications for 90 days. We’re sorry, but your email message to (titled Re: redacted) didn’t work. Replaying “OK” got another user’s message I now get. Replying “OK” to a message of myself is now functional.
Will be waiting until 2.7 is migrated to the stable branch and report back.Īre you able to provide any additional reproduction steps?ĭelete rejected email after days is still default 90. Now very happy for the service of being provided with the slower stable branch.
Meta original redacted email how to#
Got previously issues with PostgreSQL 13 update, Restore problem: relation "theme_fields" does not exist and How to backup and restore a whole /var/discourse app folder? - #15 by adrelanos.
0 kommentar(er)
